SB593: Relating To Commercial Dog Breeders.
Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection: Passed, With Amendments
Feb 10, 2025 · Senate
Committee decisionWhat this measure contains
Defines a "dog breeder" as any person who owns, possesses, controls, or otherwise has charge or custody of more than ten dogs over the age of twelve months with intact sexual organs, and who sells, barters, or otherwise transfers more than three litters and more than twenty-five dogs per calendar year. Requires dog breeders to meet minimum standards of care and not place certain types of dogs in the same enclosure to ensure the proper treatment and care of dogs and the dogs' offspring. Prohibits any person from owning or having custody of more than thirty dogs over one year with intact sexual organs. Requires dog breeders to maintain specific written records for each dog for a specified period. Authorizes each county to assess, implement, and enforce its own licensing system. Establishes civil and criminal penalties for violations. Effective 7/1/2050. (SD1)
This is the description in the imported bill snapshot. It may describe a later draft than the version considered in this vote. The recorded motion above identifies the decision; the bill description does not establish the exact text voted on.
Read the measure and its historyOfficial text and draft versions
- Introduced· Jan 16, 2025 · Official original ↗
- Amended· Feb 13, 2025 · Official original ↗Published after this vote
Document dates help distinguish drafts. A document published before the vote is not proof that this was the version considered.
Recorded decision and member tally
Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection: Passed, With Amendments
This record lists 5 members; its source-reported total is 5.
Committee and conference committee votes involve the assigned members, rather than the entire House or Senate. A tally of three or five members can be a committee decision. The action above identifies the source's decision; these records do not establish that all chamber votes have been captured.
Source outcome: passed.
- Yes
- 4
- No
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Absent / excused
- 0
This outcome applies to the recorded motion. It does not by itself mean the measure became law. The original description and each member’s recorded vote are preserved below.
Read the source vote record ↗Members listed for this decision
| Member | Source district | Source party | Recorded vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angus McKelvey | SD-006 | D | Yea |
| Carol Fukunaga | SD-011 | D | Yea |
| Jarrett Keohokalole | SD-024 | D | Yea |
| Brenton Awa | SD-023 | R | Nay |
| Tim Richards | SD-004 | D | Yea |
Names come from the imported legislative person record. A profile link appears only when the person has a verified officeholder mapping applicable to the vote date. Missing mappings are kept visible rather than guessed from a name or seat.